Oprah Winfrey Leads Passionate Charge Against Deadly Driver Distractions, Texting And Cellphone Use

1 comment

Posted on 3rd May 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , , , ,

Talk show host and cultural trendsetter Oprah Winfrey is continuing her passionate quest to make texting or using a cellphone while driving considered as dangerous, and heinous, an act as drunken driving.  And who better to get national attention on this life-threatening issue.

Winfrey declared last Friday, April 30, as National No Phone Zone Day. She had done a show on the topic back in January, and has ramped up her efforts to support the cause.

One of the high points of  Friday’s show was when it televised Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm signing that state’s anti-texting bill into law. With a stroke of her pen, Granholm made Michigan the 24th state to ban texting while driving. 

“We’re proud to be the 24th state now to be able to ban texting while driving,” Granholm said. “While talking on the phone is a distraction, clearly, texting while driving on top of that — where you don’t have your eyes on the road or your hands on the wheel or your mind on what you’re doing — it is clearly a danger.”   http://www.freep.com/article/20100501/NEWS06/5010362/Oprah-celebrates-Mich.-texting-ban

Said Oprah, “Michigan just became a safer place because of that new law.”

There was plenty of press coverage  about the signing, which may have been a non-event for newspapers until Oprah got news of the texting-ban front and forward.  

Via satellite, Oprah also went live to anti-texting and anti-cellphone use rallies in Los Angeles, Detroit, Washington, D.C., Atlanta and Boston.

The Detroit coverage, hosted by actress/comedian Ali Wentworth, included not only the bill-signing, but also a clip of  General Motors chairman and CEO Ed Whitacre. He announced that 77,000 of his U.S. employees will sign Oprah’s “No Phone Zone” pledge, which now has more than 200,000 names. http://www.oprah.com/packages/no-phone-zone.html

By pledging, drivers agree to make their car a “No Phone Zone” and refrain from using their phone while driving, eliminating distractions from incoming calls, texts or e-mails. Among those that have signed the pledge are Sandra Bullock, Jeff Bridges, Olympic star Sean White, Jerry Seinfeld, Oscar winners Jeff Bridges and Mo’Nique, Tyler Perry and the cast of the hit TV show “Glee.”

At the rally in Washington Secretary of  Transportation Ray LaHood, who is spearheading a federal ban on texting by truckers behind the wheel, make some remarks.

Correspondent Lisa Ling lead  the Los Angeles rally, interviewing celebrities who have signed Oprah’s petition for anti-texting and cellphone use laws, including Mario Lopez and last year’s “American Idol” winner Kris Allen.    

Oprah, to strike home her message about the danger of distracted driving, also had the victims of motorists who were texting while driving, or using a cellphone, on her show. It was poignant, with parents talking about the deaths of their children, from a 2-year-old hit by a vehicle driven by someone texting to  a beautiful teen-aged girl who crashed and flipped over her truck while texting to a friend. Her mother and father found her body. 

Oprah also have a shout-out to a New York Times reporter, Matt Richtel,  whose series “Driven to Distraction”  just won him a Pulitzer Prize.

 

Michigan Is Considering Placing a Two-Year Moratorium on Digital Signs

0 comments

Posted on 3rd March 2010 by gjohnson in Uncategorized

, , ,

With state and federal laws being considered to ban motorists from using cellphones or texting, there’s a new driving distraction that’s drawing scrutiny and possible prohibition: digital billboards. The New York Times business section Tuesday did a story headlined “Roadside Marquee,” which talks about safety advocates worrying that fancy high-tech billboards will get people to take their eyes off the road and cause accidents.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/technology/02billboard.html?scp=1&sq;=electronic%20billboards&st;=Search

These digital billboards change appearance and are flashy and bright, natural attention grabbers, it would seem. They are already in Times Square, and cities like Detroit. At least one group, Scenic Michigan, is trying to stop this new signage from being installed throughout that state.

And last week, Michigan legislators conducted hearings on a law, the reportedly the first of its kind, that would institute a two-year ban on construction of the digital signs. And The Times said that Minnesota is going to have hearings on a similar ban later in March.

Where’s the proof that digital signs distract drivers? Well, the Federal Highway Administration has started a study that is trying to gauge whether of not the signage is distracting. That study is set to be done this summer.

And there was one study, done in 2007 by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute, that determined that digital signs were no more distracting than regular signs. But skeptics about that study’s results note that it was paid for by the billboard industry.

Some 2,000 of the 450,000 billboards in the U.S. are digitized, according to The Times.